From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyLmO-0003Lc-82 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:47:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyLmL-0003L3-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:47:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyLmL-0003L0-HN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:47:53 -0400 Received: from [206.251.247.157] (helo=mail.allcaps.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FyLmS-0002uu-FI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:48:00 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.allcaps.org [206.251.247.157]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6246D93A1 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44AC95F4.1040302@allcaps.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:47:48 -0700 From: Andrew Lentvorski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ARM9 emulation? References: <44AAF751.50605@allcaps.org> <200607050036.55448.paul@codesourcery.com> <44AB052D.1080806@allcaps.org> <200607051704.45214.mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200607051704.45214.mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Mike Swanson wrote: > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 17:17, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> You might want to put an ARM9 or ARM7 as a separate word somewhere on >> the page. Putting "qemu arm9" into any of the search engines provides >> nothing useful. > > Possibly, but wouldn't the documentation be the first place to look? You're right, I probably should have dug into the documentation and found the fact that ARM926E is an ARM9. However, do you really want to be invisible to people? Try a Google on "arm9 emulator" or "arm7 emulator". Even broken Nintendo DS emulators appear. Qemu is *nowhere* to be found (err... correction: It appears as choice 99 of "arm7 emulator"). If I hadn't already known about Qemu from a different context, I wouldn't even have found the *project* let alone found the chip number. However, whether or not you add "ARM9" is your call, not mine. If nothing else, at least this thread will hit the archives and get indexed. That should improve things some. -a