From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Mahoney Subject: Re: ReiserFS v3 choking when free space falls below 10%? Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:19:28 -0400 Message-ID: <44AD5430.1090701@suse.com> References: <1151602916.32453.40.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <1151608355.6335.79.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> <1151612146.11510.4.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <44A55271.7050501@namesys.com> <44A55591.6060500@suse.com> <1152059846.30139.11.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <44AB25EE.8030702@namesys.com> <20060706125856.fdac1d16.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> <1152200638.30139.45.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <44AD5020.6050803@suse.com> <44AD5287.4090208@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <44AD5287.4090208@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Mike Benoit , =?UTF-8?B?SnVyZSBQZcSNYXI=?= , reiserfs-list@namesys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans Reiser wrote: > There should be no possible fragmentation that would increase CPU usage > like that. With the current algorithms, in which you check one field in > the bitmap to see if it has any free blocks, it should not be possible > for scanning bitmaps to take so much time...... > > There must be a bug in there. I'm sure there is, but it's a bug that others don't seem to be seeing, including myself, and Mike reported he's not experiencing the problem anymore. Given my current workload, unless I can readily reproduce it locally, this takes a low priority for me. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErVQwLPWxlyuTD7IRArvSAJ9pXBTGPzJjHYXQFHBQhYz5CTqQXwCeM4G4 zUqhLF9xWk1XInebVRevTVo= =qzQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----