All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 sparc64] 32-bit compat for Mach64 framebuffer
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:35:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD660F.1010209@mydatex.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607060020.k660Krv1009111@harpo.it.uu.se>

Mikael Pettersson napsal(a):
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:01:04 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> 
>>Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>
>>>To: davem@davemloft.net
>>>Subject: [PATCH 2.6.17 sparc64] 32-bit compat for Mach64 framebuffer
>>>Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>
>>>In recent sparc64 kernels, starting a 32-bit mode X server on
>>>a machine with a Mach64 framebuffer (CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT=y) like
>>>an Ultra5, results in the kernel complaining:
>>>
>>>ioctl32(X:1977): Unknown cmd fd(6) cmd(40584606){00} arg(ef8dd6d8) on /dev/fb0
>>>ioctl32(X:1977): Unknown cmd fd(6) cmd(40184600){00} arg(ef8dd6e0) on /dev/fb0
>>>
>>>That's FBIOGTYPE and FBIOGATTR. These errors occur because
>>>kernel 2.6.15-rc2 changed the way sparc64 handles SPARC-specific
>>>framebuffer ioctls from 32-bit processes: before 2.6.15-rc2
>>>arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c handled them for all devices,
>>>but 2.6.15-rc2 dropped that support and changed SPARC-only
>>>framebuffer drivers like ffb.c to set up ->compat_ioctl methods
>>>pointing to sbusfb_compat_ioctl in drivers/video/sbuslib.c.
>>>However, drivers for framebuffers like the Mach64 that can exist
>>>on both SPARCs and non-SPARCs were not adjusted, so in sparc64
>>>kernels SPARC-specific framebuffer ioctls on Mach64 devices are
>>>no longer accepted from 32-bit mode processes. Hence the errors.
>>>
>>>The fix is to make atyfb_base.c set up a ->compat_ioctl pointing
>>>to sbusfb_compat_ioctl when running in a sparc64 kernel with
>>>compatibility for sparc32 user-space, and to compile and link
>>>sbuslib.o with the frambuffer driver.
>>>
>>>A complication is that sbuslib.c doesn't compile on non-SPARC
>>>machines, so we must be careful to only enable it in the case
>>>described above. That's why the patch puts an ugly "if" statement
>>>in the Makefile.
>>
>>Why not something like this?
>>
>>1. In Kconfig
>>
>>config FB_SBUSLIB
>>tristate
>>default n
>>
>>Then all the sbus drivers will have this:
>>
>>select FB_SBUSLIB
>>
>>and atyfb will have this
>>
>>select FB_SBUSLIB if SPARC64 && COMPAT
>>
>>2. In Makefile
>>obj-$(CONFIG_FB_SBUSLIB)  += sbuslib.o
>>
>>3. In sbuslib.h
>>
>>#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>int sbusfb_compat_ioctl(...);
>>#else
>>#define sbusfb_compat_ioctl NULL;
>>#endif
> 
> 
> That could work. But it's a much larger patch than mine,
> and I don't want to go around hacking random other stuff
> just to repair atyfb. It's up the the Powers That Be to
> decide whether a local fix or a global one is most appropriate.
> 
> 
>>This way, we can also eliminate all the #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT in all the
>>cg* drivers and atyfb.
> 
> 
> That would require sbuslib.h to be completely benign on
> non-SPARC machines. If it is, great, but I can't currently
> guarantee that it is.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
I have similar problem with my Raptor GFX (Permedia2). If I run 
Xserver in fb driver I get this:


ioctl32(Xorg:13334): Unknown cmd fd(7) cmd(40584606){00} arg(ff25bb9c) 
on /dev/fb0
ioctl32(Xorg:13334): Unknown cmd fd(7) cmd(40184600){00} arg(ff25bba4) 
on /dev/fb0

Is it same problem as in Atyfb ?

				Thanks
					Dan Smolik













  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-06 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-06  0:20 [PATCH 2.6.17 sparc64] 32-bit compat for Mach64 framebuffer Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-06  0:20 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-06  1:01 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-06  1:01   ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-06 19:35 ` Daniel Smolik [this message]
2006-07-07  7:17 ` David Miller
2006-07-07  7:30 ` Daniel Smolik
2006-07-07  9:30 ` David Miller
2006-07-07 10:09 ` Daniel Smolik
2006-07-07 10:15 ` David Miller
2006-07-07 10:25 ` Daniel Smolik
2006-07-07 10:30 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-06  1:44 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-06  1:44 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-06  3:52 ` David Miller
2006-07-06  3:52   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44AD660F.1010209@mydatex.cz \
    --to=marvin@mydatex.cz \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.