From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC, PATCH] per-thread exec-time stats
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:30:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AE37DA.9080205@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17582.13798.272437.979081@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1401 bytes --]
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 01:47 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_OPT_STATS
> > > > > +static inline void xnpod_acc_exec_time(xnsched_t *sched,
> > > > > + xnthread_t *threadout)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + xnticks_t now = xntimer_get_rawclock();
> > > > > + threadout->stat.exec_time += now - sched->last_csw;
> > > > > + sched->last_csw = now;
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > It would be better to only pass the thread pointer, then use the
> > > > thread->sched member. This would clearly explain the relationship
> > > > between both, and prevent any bugous attempt at mixing things.
> > >
> > > Beware, when xnpod_schedule is called from within
> > > xnpod_migrate_thread(), the sched pointer of the switched out thread is
> > > the one of the destination cpu. So, passing the sched and threadout
> > > pointers to xnpod_acc_exec_time is safer.
> >
> > Nope, the nklock is held by the migrating thread all along until the
> > switch has actually occured.
>
> xnpod_acc_exec_time() is called from within xnpod_schedule() that is
> called from within xnpod_migrate_thread() at a time where
> threadout->sched is the wrong pointer.
>
True, will revert this.
Thanks,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-07 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-06 11:37 [Xenomai-core] [RFC, PATCH] per-thread exec-time stats Jan Kiszka
2006-07-06 11:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-06 14:32 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 15:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-06 15:37 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 15:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-06 16:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-06 17:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-07 8:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-07 8:04 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-07 8:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-07 8:49 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-07 9:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-07-07 11:28 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 16:37 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 23:47 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-07-07 7:54 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-07 10:22 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-07-07 10:30 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2006-07-07 13:23 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-07 13:59 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-07-07 14:25 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 15:04 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-07-06 15:06 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AE37DA.9080205@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.