From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ronald G Minnich Subject: Re: Intel hardware Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:42:54 -0600 Message-ID: <44B2BBCE.4010503@lanl.gov> References: <5247028.post@talk.nabble.com> <893D3D09-722B-4554-8FC7-25DC19ED716A@netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <893D3D09-722B-4554-8FC7-25DC19ED716A@netapp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Randy Thelen Cc: SDavies , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Randy Thelen wrote: > SDavies wrote: > >> I want to run Xen 3.0 with unmodified guests so I know I need an >> Intel chip >> with virtualisation technology. Does anyone have any recommendations >> on the >> chips/motherboards etc... to use? > > > The Intel Pentium D 920 or better (930 or 940) do very well. They are > dual-core, large cache, high speed, 64 bit capable processors that > support Intel's VT technology. > > These plug in to several boards. We used the Intel 955XBK: > > http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/d955xbk/index.htm > > This board and processor combination spec'd out quite well and > performed as expected without any issues. We didn't over clock it, we > just wanted straight functionality and it delivered. sounds good, is there a comparable AMD experience anyone has had? ron