From: jim.cromie@gmail.com (Jim Cromie)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] 18-rc1-mm1 and unchecked return-codes
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:33:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B3EEFD.5050209@gmail.com> (raw)
from the 18-rc1-mm1 announcement:
- We're getting a relatively large number of crash reports coming out of the
core sysfs/kobject/driver/bus code, and they're all really hard to diagnose.
I am suspecting that what's happening is that some registration functions
are failing and the caller is ignoring that failure. The code proceeds and
crashes much later, in obscure ways.
All these functions return error codes, and we're not checking them. We
should. So there's a patch which marks all these things as __must_check,
which causes around 1,500 new warnings.
These are all bugs and they all need to be fixed.
Many of these 1500 are from lm-sensors modules;
for example - a single function - device_create_file(),
is called 1027 times, and 'every' one is a void context return.
grep device_create_file drivers/hwmon/*.c
So, what kinds of errors are possible here ?
and what should we do if they occur ?
does it ever happen that only 1 create fails ?
do/would we care ? (not currently)
These Qs are somewhat rhetorical, theyre at least a heads-up.
FWIW, device_remove_file() is only called 9 times.
This doesnt seem to be a problem though, or we'd have heard it by now.
Specifically - hwmon/pc87360 appears to clean up after itself,
(or rather sysfs core code does), without any calls to device_remove_file()
soekris:/sys/bus/i2c/devices# ls
9191-6620@
soekris:/sys/bus/i2c/devices# rmmod pc87360
soekris:/sys/bus/i2c/devices# ls
soekris:/sys/bus/i2c/devices#
Ive gone ahead and worked up a patch against pc87360 to
count-errors-and-warn, which should suffice, at least for short term.
thanks
-jimc
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-11 18:33 Jim Cromie [this message]
2006-07-12 13:02 ` [lm-sensors] 18-rc1-mm1 and unchecked return-codes Mark M. Hoffman
2006-07-27 22:07 ` Jim Cromie
2006-07-29 2:35 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-07-29 15:09 ` Jim Cromie
2006-07-29 15:26 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-08-02 17:08 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B3EEFD.5050209@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.