From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:03:55 -0500
Message-ID: <44B6B53B.80802@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Amy Griffis <amy.griffis@hp.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Hey Steve / Amy,

In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record 
is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad]. I do not think 
that USER_ROLE_CHANGE is a good name to have associated with SELinux 
user creation/removal, not to mention that the payload of the record 
resulting from newrole looks nothing like the payload from that 
generated by semanage user -[ad].

Can we add a USER_ROLE_MODIFY, or some other label, that would indicate 
and differentiate SELinux user creation/removal from a simple newrole?

Thanks,
Mike