From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ronald G Minnich Subject: Re: Xen bootloader Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:24:07 -0600 Message-ID: <44B7B717.4050001@lanl.gov> References: <86802c440607132212l1a38c6b9v6ff01d93dea2491b@mail.gmail.com> <20060714142727.GB27172@totally.trollied.org> <200607141536.36291.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <20060714150250.GA28021@totally.trollied.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060714150250.GA28021@totally.trollied.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Levon Cc: Ian Pratt , Anthony Liguori , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, yhlu , Michael Loehr , Mark Williamson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:36:36PM +0100, Mark Williamson wrote: > > >>IIRC, Linux kexec can boot other OSes in principle, so we should be able to >>make this work for anything Linux can read the filesystem of. > > > Which is a pretty serious restriction. I'm still not clear on why this > is a preferable approach to modifying grub? let's not forget Plan 9, eh? Would this approach support plan 9? My guess is 'uh, I dunno'. ron