All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't randomize stack unless current->personality permits it
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:50:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44BBB1AA.3050703@grupopie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607151709.45870.a1426z@gawab.com>

Al Boldi wrote:
>[...] > void fn() {
> 
> 	long i = 9999999;
> 	double x,y;
> 
> 	elapsed(1);
> 	while (i--) fn2(&x,&y);
> 	printf("%4lu ",elapsed(0));
> }

You are not initializing x and y and with -Os at least my gcc really 
uses floating point load/store operations to handle that code.

Maybe the coprocessor has a hard time normalizing certain garbage on the 
stack, but without/with randomization the data comes from other 
addresses and you're just lucky with the contents.

Does this also happens if you add a "x=0, y=0;" line to that function?

-- 
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

Pointy-Haired Boss: I don't see anything that could stand in our way.
            Dilbert: Sanity? Reality? The laws of physics?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-17 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-11 19:57 [PATCH] x86: Don't randomize stack unless current->personality permits it Al Boldi
2006-07-12 16:03 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 20:12   ` Al Boldi
2006-07-12 20:27     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-12 21:13       ` Al Boldi
2006-07-13  9:44   ` Frank van Maarseveen
2006-07-13 20:51     ` Al Boldi
2006-07-13 20:54       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-15 11:29         ` Al Boldi
2006-07-15 12:22           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-15 14:09             ` Al Boldi
2006-07-15 16:15               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-15 17:39               ` Al Boldi
2006-07-17 15:50               ` Paulo Marques [this message]
2006-07-18  5:21                 ` Al Boldi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-25  0:21 Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-25  4:57 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-19 17:02 Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-20 17:23 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-24 15:57   ` Al Boldi
2006-07-16  3:58 Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-16 19:49 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-11 15:22 Frank van Maarseveen
2006-07-11 20:11 ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44BBB1AA.3050703@grupopie.com \
    --to=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=frankvm@frankvm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.