From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k6HJ0LLX027402 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:00:21 -0400 Received: from atlrel8.hp.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6HJ0L53012594 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:00:21 GMT Message-ID: <44BBDE41.7080709@hp.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:00:17 -0400 From: Paul Moore MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Updated patchset w/James' comments References: <20060717155224.060020000@hp.com> <200607171848.k6HImHUG020102@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200607171848.k6HImHUG020102@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:52:24 EDT, paul.moore@hp.com said: > >>Some changes in the patchset based on James Morris' comments over the weekend, in >>addition I rebased the patchset against 2.6.18-rc2. > > Minor comment - can you start posting these with Subject: lines that > say something like: > > Subject: [Patch X/Y] NetLabel-VNN: > > Where 'NN' gets incremented each time you post? I almost got myself a > patch set in my "to look at" queue that was half Friday's and half today's, > and no good could have come from that. And yes, it's *ok* if Friday's was > -v14 and today is -v15, if we're making progress towards merge-able code.. ;) > > (Venkat - I'm cc'ing you as I've seen the same thing with MLSXFRM patchsets)... > Sure. Unless the patchset gets accepted it it's current form (a guy can dream can't he?) I'll mark the next round as "NetLabel-v1". -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Updated patchset w/James' comments Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:00:17 -0400 Message-ID: <44BBDE41.7080709@hp.com> References: <20060717155224.060020000@hp.com> <200607171848.k6HImHUG020102@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Return-path: Received: from atlrel8.hp.com ([156.153.255.206]:38544 "EHLO atlrel8.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbWGQTAV (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:00:21 -0400 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu In-Reply-To: <200607171848.k6HImHUG020102@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:52:24 EDT, paul.moore@hp.com said: > >>Some changes in the patchset based on James Morris' comments over the weekend, in >>addition I rebased the patchset against 2.6.18-rc2. > > Minor comment - can you start posting these with Subject: lines that > say something like: > > Subject: [Patch X/Y] NetLabel-VNN: > > Where 'NN' gets incremented each time you post? I almost got myself a > patch set in my "to look at" queue that was half Friday's and half today's, > and no good could have come from that. And yes, it's *ok* if Friday's was > -v14 and today is -v15, if we're making progress towards merge-able code.. ;) > > (Venkat - I'm cc'ing you as I've seen the same thing with MLSXFRM patchsets)... > Sure. Unless the patchset gets accepted it it's current form (a guy can dream can't he?) I'll mark the next round as "NetLabel-v1". -- paul moore linux security @ hp