From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
Subject: backporting?
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:03:15 -0500
Message-ID: <44BD4C93.504@slaphack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29066-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Reiserfs List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

I also wanted to say that I'm back -- all problems with my mailserver 
bouncing messages should be fixed now.

But I do have a legitimate question:  I get my Reiser4 as the 
reiser4-for-2.6 patches.  Do new versions ever get backported to older 
kernel versions?

This is not a feature request -- if there's no backport, I'll do 
without.  I'm currently stuck on 2.6.13.4 because of a network driver, 
but it's probably easier to fix a network driver than to backport a 
filesystem.