From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <44BD77E6.6030004@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:08:06 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig8D2F6E22B91353BF2F27CD84"
Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid
Subject: [Xenomai-core] uvm/vxworks and uvm/vrtx are still being built
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig8D2F6E22B91353BF2F27CD84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=2E..intentionally? I thought those two UVM components were obsoleted by
the full user-space skin support.

On the other hand, the rtai user-space back- and front-end look a bit
"premature". Wouldn't it be better to feed this skin into the UVM build
process meanwhile?

Jan


--------------enig8D2F6E22B91353BF2F27CD84
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEvXfmniDOoMHTA+kRAklLAJ4qG9puWg/dtbD62/7olfzcpKhOYgCZAbhi
3t4NKhr7p6Aybx7A7IeCmcc=
=wRUE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig8D2F6E22B91353BF2F27CD84--