From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] updates for ctnetlink and conntrack core Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <44BE602C.9070800@trash.net> References: <44ADC2EE.905@netfilter.org> <44ADED94.3010703@trash.net> <44ADF800.80701@trash.net> <44ADFD1F.7050602@trash.net> <44AE65C0.8030209@netfilter.org> <44B1DACC.5030309@trash.net> <44B6A67F.70102@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Pablo Neira Ayuso In-Reply-To: <44B6A67F.70102@netfilter.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > So, to keep consistency with other netlink subsystem, I can remake my > patch based on this assumptions: > > - NEW events dump everything but values that are unset like counters, > mark, ... > - UPDATE events dump everything but unset fields and the counters, they > don't provide very useful information AFAICS. > - DESTROY, dump everything, counters included. > > Please let me know what you think. That sounds good, but I don't think DESTROY needs to dump more than NEW or UPDATE.