From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:08:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44BE8324.2060103@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44BE7291.2080306@pobox.com>
Hello.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address
>> returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was
>> absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI
>> core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name. As this is
>> the only case of the must_free_region flag being set, this flag may go
>> away as well...
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> I agree you have identified a bug, but this is not a solution.
> The current driver bug is that it calls request_region() potentially on
> an MMIO address, but the solution is _not_ to completely avoid reserving
> the resource.
It's not even a MMIO/PIO address anymore after pci_iomap() -- it either
went thru ioremap() or ioport_map() which both change the mapping from the
physical to the virtual address (or some equivalent of it for I/O ports).
> The region registered with the PCI core, but _not_ claimed by anyone.
> Someone still needs to either call pci_{request,release}_regions() or
> request_[mem_]region() to indicate that the resource is reserved.
Sigh, it seems I've missed that difference. So, I'll recast...
> This bug you have found was probably a missed detail during the
> conversion to the iomap API.
Well, not only that: it was wrong once the driver started using MMIO
(which is of course a preference).
> Jeff
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-19 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 18:25 [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips Sergei Shtylylov
2006-07-19 17:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-19 19:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2006-07-19 19:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-27 19:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44BE8324.2060103@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.