From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: ricknu-0@student.ltu.se
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>,
Shorty Porty <getshorty_@hotmail.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
larsbj@gullik.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:26:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C3DB6C.6010800@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1153683377.44c3cfb146443@portal.student.luth.se>
ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
>>> +#undef false
>>> +#undef true
>>> +
>>> +enum {
>>> + false = 0,
>>> + true = 1
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define false false
>>> +#define true true
>> Can someone please tell me what advantage 'define true true' is going to
>> bring, besides than being able to '#ifdef true'?
>
> Assembly-code can not use enum but #define. That is the reason I find but there
> might be more.
That won't work -- the #define just makes the enum available, which
doesn't work at the assembler level.
But assembly code doesn't use this stuff, so no worries.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-19 20:38 [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean ricknu-0
2006-07-19 21:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-19 23:17 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-20 0:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-20 3:04 ` Vadim Lobanov
2006-07-20 3:53 ` Shorty Porty
2006-07-20 3:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-20 8:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-04 14:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 14:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 14:35 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 15:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 15:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 16:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 16:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 18:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-04 18:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 19:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-06 9:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-06 9:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-06 9:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-06 15:31 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 16:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-19 21:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-07-19 22:47 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-19 23:52 ` Peter Williams
2006-07-20 0:08 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-20 8:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 1:24 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2) ricknu-0
2006-07-21 1:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 8:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-21 21:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-25 19:04 ` Roman Kononov
2006-07-21 22:31 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 19:56 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-21 14:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 18:27 ` Michael Buesch
2006-07-21 21:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 22:11 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 8:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 23:08 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3) ricknu-0
2006-07-21 23:27 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 5:40 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-22 17:08 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 18:08 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-22 8:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-22 17:19 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 9:55 ` Lars Gullik Bjønnes
2006-07-23 15:43 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 15:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4) ricknu-0
2006-07-23 16:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-23 19:36 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 20:26 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-23 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-23 21:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-23 21:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-24 8:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-23 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2006-07-23 19:46 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 20:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-23 21:13 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-25 23:22 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 5) ricknu-0
2006-07-26 0:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-26 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6) ricknu-0
2006-07-27 1:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 2:10 ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-27 3:51 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 4:40 ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-27 4:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 3:30 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-28 16:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-27 2:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-27 3:22 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 5:27 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-27 6:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 19:55 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 20:13 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-28 1:29 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-28 1:56 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-28 12:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-28 20:24 ` Lars Noschinski
2006-07-28 21:31 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-27 19:46 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 7) ricknu-0
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C3DB6C.6010800@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=getshorty_@hotmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=larsbj@gullik.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=vlobanov@speakeasy.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.