From: Rick Gonzalez <rcgneo@us.ibm.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [HVM]xm-test: HANG during enforce_dom0_cpus
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:57:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C43719.2040101@us.ibm.com> (raw)
I see this problem in 32bit and 64bit. I start xmtest and everything
is fine until it gets to enforce_dom0_cpus test case. xm-test just hangs
during that test for ever. I enabled debug in Console.py and I get the
following output after doing Ctrl-c:
[dom0] Running `/etc/init.d/xend start'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./01_enforce_dom0_cpus_basic_pos.test", line 76, in ?
status = restartXend()
File "/usr/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Xm.py",
line 207, in restartXend
status, output = traceCommand("/etc/init.d/xend start")
File "/usr/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Test.py",
line 99, in traceCommand
status, output = commands.getstatusoutput(command)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/commands.py", line 59, in getstatusoutput
tmp = pipe.read()
KeyboardInterrupt
FAIL: 01_enforce_dom0_cpus_basic_pos.test
===================
1 of 1 tests failed
===================
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[1]: *** [check-am] Interrupt
make: *** [check-recursive] Interrupt
It seems to be hanging in "pipe.read()" code. It seems to be waiting for
something that never happens. It gets in this state after changing the
vcpus to 1. The system is fine not crashing or anything like that.
dmesg contains the following info:
Breaking affinity for irq 281
Breaking affinity for irq 282
Breaking affinity for irq 283
Breaking affinity for irq 284
Breaking affinity for irq 285
Breaking affinity for irq 286
Breaking affinity for irq 287
Breaking affinity for irq 288
Breaking affinity for irq 289
Breaking affinity for irq 290
Breaking affinity for irq 291
Breaking affinity for irq 292
Breaking affinity for irq 293
Breaking affinity for irq 294
Breaking affinity for irq 295
Breaking affinity for irq 296
Breaking affinity for irq 297
Breaking affinity for irq 298
Breaking affinity for irq 299
Breaking affinity for irq 300
Breaking affinity for irq 301
Breaking affinity for irq 302
Breaking affinity for irq 303
Any ideas?
reply other threads:[~2006-07-24 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C43719.2040101@us.ibm.com \
--to=rcgneo@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.