From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6OCJkwh009529 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:19:46 -0400 Received: from conterra.de (vvv.conterra.de [212.124.44.162]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6OCJc7i013345 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:19:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by conterra.de (-) with ESMTP id 9DD001F4263 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from conterra.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vvv.conterra.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21340-02 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44C4BAC0.7090508@conterra.de> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:19:12 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dieter_St=FCken?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Failed PV recovery References: <200607232019.52718.peregrine@openbrainstem.net> In-Reply-To: <200607232019.52718.peregrine@openbrainstem.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > 4. Are there better ways I could have handled this (other than the obvious > like RAID to start with, etc.)? Hi Lamont, I strongly suggest to use: http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ to monitor all disks. In most cases you get warnings about problems with your disks weeks before they fail completely. > A few months ago, I started seeing some unreadable sectors on the 45GB drive. ... but you have to take it seriously :-) Dieter.