From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:03:50 -0700 Message-ID: <44C56DF6.3020509@hp.com> References: <20060724.162250.55836503.davem@davemloft.net> <200607250202.02913.ak@suse.de> <44C565D1.6070202@hp.com> <20060724.174518.52116903.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ak@suse.de, rdreier@cisco.com, tom@opengridcomputing.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:27350 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932368AbWGYBEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:04:16 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060724.174518.52116903.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > It would have to be done in such a way as to not make the PAWS > tests fail by accident. But I think it's doable. CPU ID and higher-order generation number such that whenever the process migrates to a lower-numbered CPU, the generation number is bumped to make the timestamp larger than before? rick jones