From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <44C6174B.6020705@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:06:19 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB582441EF5@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB582441EF5@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] resend notes from lastweek List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Wichmann, Mats D" Cc: "Printing-Sc (E-mail)" , Michael Sweet , Ian Murdock , printing-architecture , lsb-discuss , freestandards-fhs-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, Wendy Phillips Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > possibly we also want freestandards-fhs-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net > (added with this message) as it's the official list of FHS. > > it's possible we could conceive a less scattered scheme for > printer drivers - I'm envisioning something like reserving > /opt/printing with LANANA, then providing a way to manage > that namespace so it can be shared, perhaps through a second > registry. > This means that if LANANA registers /opt/printing we can agree on only the pair /opt/printing/ppd/// /opt/printing/drivers// as the only PPD/driver directories? Till