From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike D. Day" Subject: Re: New Device Model? Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:55:32 -0400 Message-ID: <44C69354.7020801@us.ibm.com> References: <051D8EDA5FB1C3488002AB2F0A939CFC2030E2@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net> <1153277084.22564.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1153277084.22564.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel Stekloff Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk, "Ahamed K, Rafiq (STSD)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Daniel Stekloff wrote: > 2) How will we handle the needed privileged hypercalls in the "stub" > domain? We'll have domain0 run them on its behalf to start, making > "exceptions" for privileged calls doesn't sound like a good idea. Are you talking about the dom0 hypercalls or others? domU hypercalls should be made by the stub domain on behalf of the fully virtualized dommain, right? thanks in advance, Mike