All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Regnard <devel@regnard.org>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: multiport tolerance changes
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:32:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C73691.1080302@regnard.org> (raw)

Hi all,

I recently upgraded my firewall setup. Mainly upgrading kernel from 
2.6.8 to 2.6.16 and iptables from 1.2.7 to 1.3.5. And I had to modify my 
  firewall rules due to what I think is a syntax tolerance change 
regarding multiport.

With iptables 1.2.7 I had some rules where I could write some multiport 
(port lists or ranges) both for source and destination ports, like this:

/sbin/iptables -A fw2net_eth3 -p tcp -m multiport -s 82.67.103.87 
--sport 1024:65535 -d 0.0.0.0/0 --dports 80,8080,81,8000,1755 -j ACCEPT

iptables was coping well with this and expanded the port matrix into 
appropriate single rules (ipchains was also able to do this well in its 
good time). But  iptables 1.3.5 refuses to have multiport for both 
source and destination ports and objects:

iptables v1.3.5: multiport can only have one option

So I have to re-write my firewall rules.

What is the reason why this practical feature (expanding the port 
matrix) disapeared ? Is it related to the merge of extended multiport 
into multiport (including ranges in lists) ?
Is there any plan to re-introcduce such a functionality in the future 
releases of iptables ?

Thanks for your comments on this.

Vincent


             reply	other threads:[~2006-07-26  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-26  9:32 Vincent Regnard [this message]
2006-07-26 11:35 ` multiport tolerance changes Pascal Hambourg
2006-07-26 14:21   ` Vincent Regnard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44C73691.1080302@regnard.org \
    --to=devel@regnard.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.