From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: Is the qla3xxx driver in the mainline? Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:20:22 +0400 Message-ID: <44C75E06.1060402@tls.msk.ru> References: <44C6E546.8030502@tw.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:38496 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750739AbWGZMU0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:20:26 -0400 To: albertl@mail.com In-Reply-To: <44C6E546.8030502@tw.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Albert Lee wrote: [] > (I am curious to have some performance comparison of > qla3xxx + open iscsi v.s. qla4xxx + on board TOE/iscsi.) On wich card? I've been told that IPS4010 for example isn't supported by qla3xxx. BTW, I found qla4xxx (on IPS4010) performs noticeable worse than open-iscsi stack on top of tigon (non-jumbo- frames-capable) GigE NIC (on an eserver xSeries 346 machine). /mjt