From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: DAEMON_END message subj field
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:51:17 -0500
Message-ID: <44C8D2E5.6090002@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Hey Steve,

In the DAEMON_END message, it seems like the subj context is cut short:

type=DAEMON_END msg=audit(1153997923.281:9429) auditd normal halt, 
sending auid=0 pid=3218 subj=root:staff_r:staff, auditd pid=3209

vs

type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1153997824.379:314): audit_enabled=1 old=1 
by auid=0 subj=root:staff_r:staff_t:s0-s15:c0.c255

CONFIG_CHANGE and others include the MLS label, but DAEMON_END does 
not... is this by design or an oversight?

Thanks,
Mike