From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
jack@suse.cz, 20@madingley.org, marcel@holtmann.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com,
adilger@clusterfs.com
Subject: Re: Bad ext3/nfs DoS bug
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:32:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C906CB.8050100@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17608.96.409298.126686@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday July 26, sandeen@sandeen.net wrote:
>> Hm, with this, ext3.ko has a new dependency on exportfs.ko. Is that
>> desirable/acceptable?
>
> Drat, you're right.
> No, I don't think that is what we want.
> I'll do it differently in a day or so.
Would moving export_iget into fs/inode.c & exporting it from there be a
reasonable way to go? At least ext2 & ext3 both have this need (prevent
nfs access to special inodes) so putting the bulk of what they need for
get_dentry (i.e. export_iget) somewhere common seems like a decent
option to me.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-27 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 13:01 Bad ext3/nfs DoS bug James
2006-07-17 13:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-17 18:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-18 7:55 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-18 14:56 ` James
2006-07-18 15:22 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-18 15:23 ` James
2006-07-18 20:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-19 9:28 ` James
2006-07-19 15:55 ` Jan Kara
2006-07-20 4:46 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-20 16:06 ` Jan Kara
2006-07-20 20:11 ` James
2006-07-21 6:44 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-21 6:39 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-21 14:24 ` Jan Kara
2006-07-22 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-22 13:17 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-25 1:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-25 2:21 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-26 17:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-07-26 23:53 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-27 18:32 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2006-07-27 19:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-28 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-28 13:27 ` Peter Staubach
2006-07-28 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-25 2:36 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-25 18:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-07-21 0:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-07-21 12:29 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-22 3:38 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C906CB.8050100@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=20@madingley.org \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.