From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <44C9088A.20608@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:40:10 -0700 From: Nathaniel Villaume MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] doc patch: RT_TASK_INFO References: <1154015872-24969.00053.00861-smmsdV2.1.4@domain.hid> <44C8EECE.4070209@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <44C8EECE.4070209@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org The patches were to help you out! I thought that maybe you wouldn't want RT_TASK documented -- users don't really need to konw about magic number and flowgen, do they? But yeah, sorry for the spamming. As for the comment style, the C style comments don't show up using this inline method: /*!< */ -- that was part of the original problem. One solution is to use the @typedef command. The only drawback here is the minor replication. For example: /*! @typedef RT_TASK @brief Contains important data @param magic Magic uniquely identifies the task's wizardry ancestry @param prio task priority */ typedef struct { int magic; // Must come first! (comments don't HAVE to go here) uint prio; // task priority /* etc */ } RT_TASK; What I need to know from you: 1) Do you care about this duplication of struct member-names (harder to keep docs synchronized with code)? 2) Do you want RT_TASK member documentation to show up in doxygen-generated pages? (this lets me know what to change) -Nate