From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
 regarding reiser4 inclusion
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:23:26 -0500
Message-ID: <44C920BE.7000006@slaphack.com>
References: <44C12F0A.1010008@namesys.com> <20060722130219.GB7321@thunk.org>  <44C26F65.4000103@namesys.com> <44C28A8F.1050408@garzik.org>  <44C32348.8020704@namesys.com>  <1153854781.5893.5.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com>  <44C6AE9E.6020300@slaphack.com>  <44C77B8A.7090303@namesys.com> <1153937787.25828.51.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com> <44C81493.7030900@slaphack.com> <768278935.20060727221116@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29228-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <768278935.20060727221116@wp.pl>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFjaWVqIFNvxYJ0eXNpYWs=?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Cc: ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Maciej So=C5=82tysiak wrote:
> Hello David,
>=20
> Thursday, July 27, 2006, 3:19:15 AM, you wrote:
>> I'm not arguing for closed source, I'm just saying that once you open,
>> there's no going back.  Many times it's a good thing, but sometimes you
> A sidenote.
>=20
> Reiser4 is open and still we don't see people writing plugins as crazy.
> I belive there is one group that tried to be the first outside of
> namesys to write a plugin but still no success.

Kernel inclusion would help a lot.  Decent documentation would be=20
better, though.  Someone should look at what FUSE is doing right.=20
Plugins fill a lot of the same niches, but with significantly better=20
performance.