From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:01:43 -0600 Message-ID: <44CBE8D7.7010008@namesys.com> References: <200607281402.k6SE245v004715@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <44CA31D2.70203@slaphack.com> <44C9FB93.9040201@namesys.com> <44CA6905.4050002@slaphack.com> <44CA126C.7050403@namesys.com> <44CA8771.1040708@slaphack.com> <44CABB87.3050509@namesys.com> <17611.21640.208153.492074@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <44CBA99F.2040306@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <44CBA99F.2040306@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Masover Cc: Nikita Danilov , Linus Torvalds , "Horst H. von Brand" , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , LKML , ReiserFS List David Masover wrote: >Nikita Danilov wrote: > > > >>As you see, ext2 code already has multiple file "plugins", with >>persistent "plugin id" (stored in i_mode field of on-disk struct >>ext2_inode). >> >> > >Aha! So here's another question: Is it fair to ask Reiser4 to make its >plugins generic, or should we be asking ext2/3 first? > > > Shhhhh....., ext* already made their plugins generic, job is done....:)