From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5 Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:46:25 -0600 Message-ID: <44CC0161.60806@namesys.com> References: <9a8748490607251516j1433306ek9c64cc84c0838f7b@mail.gmail.com> <20060725232924.GU6452@schatzie.adilger.int> <9a8748490607291518m59573244wac00486a64f6385b@mail.gmail.com> <44CBEA7A.4010308@namesys.com> <9a8748490607292317t405c906ek8b1577920eeace65@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <9a8748490607292317t405c906ek8b1577920eeace65@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexander Viro , Al Viro , reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, akpm@osdl.org, Alexander Zarochentcev Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser wrote: > >> Jesper Juhl wrote: >> >> > >> > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite. >> > >> Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression >> suite.... >> > That's nice. > > Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out? > > Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode > is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked > against?" - can you comment on that? > > Err, how about Zam handles all locking issues and this is Sunday with the family? I know, lame, but he'll answer you on Monday Russian time.....;-)