From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Christian Trefzer <ctrefzer@gmx.de>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:30:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44CD4127.9010202@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060730223755.GA14386@hermes.uziel.local>
Christian Trefzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
> accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
Hmm, I'm curious, though... How does it react to a few billion files?
Sorry, I can't test this, but I will be testing MythTV, if not now, then
in a few weeks.
> Congratulations and thanks to the namesys developers! Hans, I can
> somewhat understand how you feel about your situation. Don't let
> frustration get in your way, your work is simply too great. You're an
[...]
> screwing over society ; ) Sometimes you just have to swallow your pride
> instead of wasting your time by yelling at the rest of the world, and if
> "humble work" does not lead to success, there won't be any other way, I
> fear.
Amen. I do not want to see Reiser4 not succeed because of politics, and
it really looks like the only way to win the political war is not to
play. The technical stuff is really the last way in, but neither side
has said anything technical in awhile. The most technical things that
have happened lately is Hans pointing to benchmarks and LKML pointing to
ext3 "plugins".
I suspect part of this is simply the word "plugin" coming around to bite
us in the ass, but whatever. We're all tired of this fight.
> IMHO it would be best to deliver "quality patches" against all kinds of
> sources (distro kernels, vanilla -rcs maybe, etc.)
Well, we have the patches against vanilla, which seem to work well with
at least a few other patches I've tried.
> and the entire
> patched source tarball as well, for people to download and build. Next
> step would be to provide binary packages, and repos for people to add to
> their package manager's source list. Until distros pick up their
> respective patch, this is as far as support can go, I guess.
That would actually be pretty good, for anyone making the conscious
decision to use a filesystem. Still need official distro support to get
the people who don't (think they) care.
> So, what do you all say?
Sounds good. I don't have any idea of the work required, either...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-30 22:38 reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me Christian Trefzer
2006-07-30 23:18 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-31 8:08 ` David Masover
2006-07-31 14:49 ` Dan Oglesby
2006-07-30 23:30 ` David Masover [this message]
2006-07-31 21:28 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-07-31 21:46 ` David Masover
2006-08-01 11:28 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-01 18:10 ` Ebuild/rpm/deb repo's (was Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...) Sander Sweers
2006-08-01 21:12 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-01 21:59 ` Sander Sweers
2006-08-01 23:32 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-03 8:55 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2006-08-03 9:02 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2006-08-03 9:02 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-03 11:02 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-03 11:49 ` Sander Sweers
2006-08-06 14:23 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-07 9:24 ` Christian Trefzer
2006-08-07 17:09 ` David Masover
2006-08-07 18:52 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-07 23:23 ` David Masover
2006-08-07 23:31 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-08 0:05 ` David Masover
2006-08-08 8:55 ` Sander Sweers
2006-08-08 20:47 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2006-08-08 9:56 ` Christian Trefzer
2006-08-08 10:26 ` Sarath Menon
2006-08-09 4:01 ` David Masover
2006-08-09 7:22 ` Christian Trefzer
2006-08-09 16:14 ` David Masover
2006-07-31 1:33 ` reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me Joe Feise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44CD4127.9010202@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=ctrefzer@gmx.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.