Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis

[Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>]

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:15:50 +0200, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, that is what I wanted.  Imagine if a exception happened on first
>>> place on non-leaf function.  In this case, we must assume the function
>>> is leaf since RA is not saved to the stack.
>> The only case I can imagine is when sp is corrupted which is unlikely.
> 
> Modern gcc somtimes do amazing optimization ;-)
> 
>> However an exception can occure just after a prologue of a nested
>> function which is more likely. In that case you will assume wrongly
>> that the function was a leaf one.
> 
> Why?  get_frame_info() should detect frame_size and pc_offset for that
> case.
> 
> Is your objection against "info->func_size / 4" part?  the "4" comes
> from size of a instruction.
>

OK. I missed that, sorry.

> Well, using "4" instead of "sizeof(union mips_instruction)" or
> "sizeof(*ip)" was my old fault...

Well could we use "sizeof(union mips_instruction)" so nobody won't
make the same mistake ?

 		if (i >= info->func_size / sizeof(union mips_instruction))
 			break;

BTW I omit the first condition "info->func_size != 0" because
normally a func has a no null size. If it has we should stop
right now.

We should also test this condition _before_ testing that "*ip" is
a jal instruction, shouldn't we ?

		Franck