From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:52:18 -0500 Message-ID: <44CE3542.7030603@slaphack.com> References: <1153760245.5735.47.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <200607241806.k6OI6uWY006324@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <20060731125846.aafa9c7c.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <20060731144736.GA1389@merlin.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20060731144736.GA1389@merlin.emma.line.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Adrian Ulrich , "Horst H. von Brand" , ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Matthias Andree wrote: > Adrian Ulrich schrieb am 2006-07-31: >> Why are a lot of Solaris-people using (buying) VxFS? Maybe because UFS >> also has such silly limitations? (..and performs awkward with trillions >> of files..?..) > > Well, such "silly limitations"... looks like they are mostly hot air > spewn by marketroids that need to justify people spending money on their > new filesystem. I think the limitations are silly, and I'm not paid to say this. Besides, we're talking about a filesystem that will be free (and libre), so I don't see the point of marketroids, certainly not in this context. But let's not stoop to name-calling.