From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:43:34 -0500 Message-ID: <44CE7986.80109@slaphack.com> References: <1153760245.5735.47.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <20060731144736.GA1389@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060731175958.1626513b.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <20060731162224.GJ31121@lug-owl.de> <20060731173239.GO31121@lug-owl.de> <20060731181120.GA9667@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060731184314.GQ31121@lug-owl.de> <20060731191712.GE17206@HAL_5000D.tc.ph.cox.net> <1154374923.7230.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1154382026.7230.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1154382026.7230.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alan Cox Cc: Gregory Maxwell , Clay Barnes , Rudy Zijlstra , Adrian Ulrich , vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Llu, 2006-07-31 am 17:00 -0400, ysgrifennodd Gregory Maxwell: >> Are you sure that you aren't commenting on cases where Reiser3 alerts >> the user to a critical data condition (via a panic) which leads to a >> trouble report while ext3 ignores the problem which suppresses the >> trouble report from the user? > > man mount > > Ext3 is configurable, and has been for years via the errors= option. Sure, but I think the suggestion is that the reason we generally see more ReiserFS complaints than ext3 complaints might be because of the default level of errors logged.