From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
 regarding reiser4 inclusion
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:33:27 -0600
Message-ID: <44CEBD77.2060502@namesys.com>
References: <20060731165406.GA8526@merlin.emma.line.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29380-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20060731165406.GA8526@merlin.emma.line.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@blinkenlights.ch>, vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Matthias Andree wrote:

>
>>Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action?
>>    
>>
>
>No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I
>will.
>  
>
WAFL was well done.   It has several innovations that I admire,
including quota trees, non-support of fragments for performance reasons,
and the basic WAFL notion applied to an NFS RAID special (though
important) case.