Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
> Citerar "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>:
> 
>> ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
>>> This patch defines:
>>> * a generic boolean-type, named "bool"
>>> * aliases to 0 and 1, named "false" and "true"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
>> Shouldn't this simply use _Bool?
> 
> Well, it is (now) just a typedef of it. :)
> 
> But I find it better, both because it is more similar to the common types:
> short, lowlettered words. But also because most editors with highlightning
> recognize "bool", but not "_Bool", as a type (as I found it).
> 

<stdbool.h> should include:

typedef _Bool bool;
#define true  1
#define false 0

There is no enum involved.

	-hpa