From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <44D0D5A5.7070900@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:41:09 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB58254DED6@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB58254DED6@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Proposed filesystem layout for print ppd and driver files List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Wichmann, Mats D" Cc: wendyp@jurassic.eng.sun.com, rusty@samba.org, printing-architecture , "McDonald, Ira" , Wendy Phillips Wichmann, Mats D wrote: >>>Except that I do NOT agree that the symlinks should be >>>mandatory - if a print software vendor wants to store >>>directly and ONLY in '/opt/share/ppd//', >>>that is sufficient and _preferable_ to the creation of >>>more '/opt/' directories for a useless level >>>of indirection. >> >>Does the FHS allow files other than symlinks in subdirectories of >>/opt/share/ and /opt/lib? > > > Yes, but it does not allow a software packager to > put them there. > > "The directories /opt/bin, /opt/doc, /opt/include, /opt/info, /opt/lib, > and /opt/man are reserved for local system administrator use. Packages > may provide "front-end" files intended to be placed in (by linking or > copying) these reserved directories by the local system administrator, > but must function normally in the absence of these reserved > directories." > > (so it doesn't mention /opt/share explicitly but it seems > like the intent is clear) > Does this mean that for third-party vendors only /opt// is allowed and nothing outside of this? Then I see the only solution in /opt//ppd/.ppd for the PPD files of this supplier and requiring absolute paths in the PPD to the driver, which can be at an arbitrary place in /opt//. WDYT? Till