From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: Pentium D 915 support Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:51:41 +0400 Message-ID: <44D21B8D.8030204@linux.intel.com> References: <1154265136.21063.10.camel@skylla.slagter.name> <44CCD154.3080606@linux.intel.com> <1154275129.21063.31.camel@skylla.slagter.name> <1154605493.4302.494.camel@queen.suse.de> <1154605725.14206.22.camel@localhost> <1154617009.4302.515.camel@queen.suse.de> <44D21666.5030304@linux.intel.com> <1154619193.23310.6.camel@skylla.slagter.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1154619193.23310.6.camel@skylla.slagter.name> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Erik Slagter Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Erik Slagter wrote: > On do, 2006-08-03 at 19:29 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: >>> This could be intended (avoid possible performance losses), but also >>> just be a BIOS bug. >> This is not BIOS bug, it is just a way to avoid dynamic memory allocation in BIOS. >> And it has nothing to do with performance losses due to note above. > > BTW Is there intention to correct the output of > cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU?/performance as well? Intention was to keep it as reference of BIOS output, so no, there is no intention to correct it, unless you give a reason to do that.