From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: Checksumming blocks? [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:51:59 -0400 Message-ID: <44D3B36F.7010501@slaphack.com> References: <200607312314.37863.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> <200608011428.k71ESIuv007094@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <20060801165234.9448cb6f.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <1154446189.15540.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44CF84F0.8080303@slaphack.com> <1154452770.15540.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44CF9217.6040609@slaphack.com> <20060803135811.GA7431@merlin.emma.line.org> <44D285DF.7060905@elegant-software.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <44D285DF.7060905@elegant-software.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Russell Leighton Cc: Matthias Andree , Alan Cox , Adrian Ulrich , "Horst H. von Brand" , bernd-schubert@gmx.de, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, jbglaw@lug-owl.de, clay.barnes@gmail.com, rudy@edsons.demon.nl, ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell Leighton wrote: > Is there a recovery mechanism, or do you just be happy you know there is > a problem (and go to backup)? You probably go to backup anyway. The recovery mechanism just means you get to choose the downtime to restore from backup (if there is downtime), versus being suddenly down until you can restore.