From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: Another article abour Reiser4 on linux.com Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:51:22 -0400 Message-ID: <44D5592A.8020608@slaphack.com> References: <87bqqzbaug.fsf@baldur.nicundtas.de> <44D4B154.6010005@slaphack.com> <28295017.20060805181722@wp.pl> <1254266559.20060805182204@wp.pl> <20060805180722.GN17805@HAL_5000D.tc.ph.cox.net> <44D5103C.2030201@slaphack.com> <20060806004442.GQ17805@HAL_5000D.tc.ph.cox.net> <44D5485B.5070208@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: TongKe Xue Cc: Clay Barnes , =?UTF-8?B?TWFjaWVqIFNvxYJ0eXNpYWs=?= , reiserfs-list@namesys.com TongKe Xue wrote: > A really stupid question ... why not put Reiser4 in one of the BSDs? > > And after it's got mainstream use, if it proves its worth, there'll be > more pressure for Linux to adopt. It will likely take far more work to port it to BSD than it will to be included in Linux. And you're talking about probably even less chance of inclusion or of picking up a large community than in Linux.