From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <44D761CD.9000806@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:52:45 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1B47D24854C7BC4FA8DA28BEBB59B0BA4176AE@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1B47D24854C7BC4FA8DA28BEBB59B0BA4176AE@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] Agreement on directory structure for printing List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Bastian, Waldo" Cc: lsb-discuss , printing-architecture , "Printing-Sc (E-mail)" Thank you for this, i have not seen that Wendy suggested something completely different for /usr/local/. What I mean is this: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Files created, downloaded, or modified by a system administrator. a. Installation path for PPD files /usr/local/share/ppd// b. Installation path for print drivers /usr/local/lib/printdriver/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- This way it is the very same structure as in /usr/ and/opt/. Till Bastian, Waldo wrote: > Given these directories: > /usr/share/ppd/// > /usr/lib/printdriver/ > Is there any particular reason for using > /usr/local/print/ppd// > /usr/local/print/driver/ > Instead of > /usr/local/share/ppd// > /usr/local/lib/printdriver/ > ??