From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: Questioning the Xen Design of the VMM Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:22:25 -0400 Message-ID: <44D8D661.2060505@redhat.com> References: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0BA7FE10@sefsexmb1.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0BA7FE10@sefsexmb1.amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Petersson, Mats" Cc: Al Boldi , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Mat, thanks for the reply Petersson, Mats wrote: > > > Hidden parts of segment registers is one of the "security features" of > the 286 architecture, but it also creates some pretty interesting > scenarios for us programmers... The missing part in my mind was that I didn't know that the segment registers can't be completely read. A colleague of mine told me a little more about them. Yuck! Thanks for the nice write ups though. -- Steve