From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Another article abour Reiser4 on linux.com
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:07:18 -0600
Message-ID: <44D997B6.30306@namesys.com>
References: <87bqqzbaug.fsf@baldur.nicundtas.de> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608051913200.12088@robo.Stanford.EDU> <44D5A650.3080708@namesys.com> <200608061304.42692.bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29548-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <200608061304.42692.bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, TongKe Xue <xue@ai.stanford.edu>, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>, Clay Barnes <clay.barnes@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?TWFjaWVqIFNvxYJ0eXNpYWs=?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>

Bernd Schubert wrote:

>
>
>An alternative might be a reiser4 fuse port. 
>
Fuse is not performance effective.