From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: article abour Reiser4 on linux.com Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:28:25 -0600 Message-ID: <44D99CA9.9040807@namesys.com> References: <87bqqzbaug.fsf@baldur.nicundtas.de> <44D5B43D.3060501@namesys.com> <1154904931.6553.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1154904931.6553.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: bbyfield@axion.net Cc: Tassilo Horn , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Bruce, I read your article on Linus and GPL V3, and I understand that you are frustrated by his not going for V3. I suspect the main thing that sparked your concern in writing the article about reiser4 is that I am somehow doing something different that affects licensing, and not conforming on that issue. Plugins have nothing to do with licensing issues --- that was purely Linus getting confused. Plugins are compiled in. Bruce Byfield wrote: > > I believe that you make a >reference to two people working on XFS, one of whom other people later >identify as Steve Lord. > > They wrongly identify him. > > >Unfortunately, it's not one of which editors approve. It too easily >looks as though the writer is being influenced by the source. > > >If I were to do so, I'd risk being banned from publication. > > Wow. I thought only the judiciary insulated itself from ever learning of its mistakes that well.:-/