From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:37:45 -0600 Message-ID: <44D99ED9.1030003@namesys.com> References: <200608011428.k71ESIuv007094@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <44CF87E6.1050004@slaphack.com> <20060806225912.GC4205@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20060806225912.GC4205@ucw.cz> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Masover , "Horst H. von Brand" , Bernd Schubert , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Jan-Benedict Glaw , Clay Barnes , Rudy Zijlstra , Adrian Ulrich , ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > >Yes, I'm afraid redundancy/checksums kill write speed, > they kill write speed to cache, but not to disk.... our compression plugin is faster than the uncompressed plugin.....