From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Cc: albertl@mail.com, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alan@redhat.com, Unicorn Chang <uchang@tw.ibm.com>,
Doug Maxey <dwm@enoyolf.org>
Subject: Re: libata pata_pdc2027x success on sparc64
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:05:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DA07D6.9010101@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17626.1619.653854.241578@alkaid.it.uu.se>
Hello.
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > The libata version has three improvements compared to the IDE version.
> >
> > 1. The PLL calibration patches in the above URLs (for IDE)
> > still need more improvement as done in the pdc_read_counter()
> > of the libata version.
> >
> > 2. The Promise 2027x adapters check the "set features - xfer mode"
> > and set the timing register automatically. However, the automatically
> > set values are not correct under 133MHz. Libata has a hook
> > pdc2027x_post_set_mode() to set the values back by software.
> >
> > 3. ATAPI DMA is supported (please see pdc2027x_check_atapi_dma()).
> > Maybe we also need to add this to the IDE version.
> Do you know how large the difference is between the 20267 (old driver)
> and the 20269 (new driver) in the areas touched by these patches?
Immense. They belong to the different families, register compatibe only in
the standard PCI/BM IDE regisrer set -- hence was the driver split.
> Long ago I tried a 20267 PCI card in my PowerMac, and it had the same
> issues that the 20269 card had. So I'm interested in porting the
> calibration/timing fixes to pdc202xx_old.c.
They don't apply to this driver at all. The "older" chip family didn't
have the PLL to calibrate. It must be some different issue.
> /Mikael
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 23:58 libata pata_pdc2027x success on sparc64 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-18 18:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-07-27 4:31 ` Albert Lee
2006-07-27 16:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-08-09 15:59 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-09 16:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2006-08-09 16:15 ` Mikael Pettersson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 0:29 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-25 16:02 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DA07D6.9010101@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dwm@enoyolf.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=uchang@tw.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.