Marcel,
Please ignore previous patch,
Frédéric


Frédéric DALLEAU a écrit :

> Hi Marcel,
>
>>> I came accross the need to startup an executable when rfcomm 
>>> receives a connection. I also added an option called watch that 
>>> allows rfcomm not to exit when the rfcomm connection is closed. It 
>>> simply loops and calls listen.
>>>
>>> listen   <dev> [channel [cmd]]          Listen
>>> watch    <dev> [channel [cmd]]          Watch
>>>
>>> rfcomm --raw watch 0 1 "cat {}"
>>> rfcomm --raw listen 0 1 "cat {}"
>>>
>>> Not specifying the cmd parameter will simply wait for [control-c] as 
>>> before.
>>>
>>> the {} will be replaced by the address of the rfcomm device created. 
>>> In the example the command run will be 'cat /dev/rfcomm0'.
>>>   
>>
> The syntax changed a little :
>
> rfcomm --raw watch  0 1 cat {}
> rfcomm --raw listen 0 1 cat {}
>
> Note that "" must no longer be added arround the command line. The 
> channel must be present as it is the number of arguments that is used 
> to determine the start of the cmdline.
>
>>
>> the feature looks useful, but the patch is not acceptable. You need to
>> fix the coding style.
>>
> Attached patch has been modified around what I've found to be coding 
> style. It's ways cleaner than the previous one. However, if it does 
> not suit you, please let me know with the maximum details.
>
>> What is the difference between listen and watch?
>>  
>>
> Watch will not quit when client disconnect. Instead, it will start 
> listening again.
>
> Thanks
> Frédéric