From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9]ext4 super block changes for >32 bit blocks numbers
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DB6CBF.1060706@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060809234105.67414f03.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:22:25 -0700
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>>In-kernel and on-disk super block changes to support >32 bit blocks numbers.
>>
>>+static inline u32 EXT4_RELATIVE_ENCODE(ext4_fsblk_t group_base,
>>+ ext4_fsblk_t fs_block)
>>+{
>>+ s32 gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ if (fs_block < (1ULL<<32) && group_base < (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return fs_block;
>>+
>>+ gdp_block = (fs_block - group_base);
>>+ BUG_ON ((group_base + gdp_block) != fs_block);
>>+
>>+ return gdp_block;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline ext4_fsblk_t EXT4_RELATIVE_DECODE(ext4_fsblk_t group_base,
>>+ u32 gdp_block)
>>+{
>>+ if (group_base >= (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return group_base + (s32) gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ if ((s32) gdp_block >= 0 && gdp_block < group_base &&
>>+ group_base + gdp_block >= (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return group_base + gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ return gdp_block;
>>+}
>
>
> These seem far too large and far too commonly called to be inlined.
>
>
>>
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_R_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_r_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_r_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_R_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_r_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_r_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_free_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_free_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_free_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_free_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>
>
> Can these not be implemented as C functions?
>
Okay, I will work with Laurent/Alex to fix this.:)
Mingming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 1:22 [PATCH 9/9]ext4 super block changes for >32 bit blocks numbers Mingming Cao
2006-08-10 1:22 ` Mingming Cao
2006-08-10 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-10 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-10 17:28 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2006-08-24 0:28 ` [Ext2-devel] " Avantika Mathur LTC
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DB6CBF.1060706@us.ibm.com \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.