From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <44DC2B80.1020403@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:02:24 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [patch] update email addr References: <44DBCCD3.5070505@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <44DBCCD3.5070505@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig09D036831D26894C6994D033" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jim Cromie Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig09D036831D26894C6994D033 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Cromie wrote: > im trying to inline this patch, > pls let me know if its still ws fouled > (in thunderbird, cp from svn diff |less, preformat b4 paste) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Index: CREDITS > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- CREDITS (revision 1412) > +++ CREDITS (working copy) > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > D: the map. >=20 > N: Jim Cromie > -E: jcromie@domain.hid > +E: jim.cromie@domain.hid > D: Comprehensive statistics collection for the testsuite. > D: Validation test script. Various script fixes and sanitization. Obviously damaged, at least here on the list (leading single whitespace missing in unmodified lines). This also applies to your second patch. The required steps with Thunderbird are: 1. start a new mail or reply as HTML (bah!), 2. set the text style of everything to preformat, 3. switch back to "Plain Text Only" under Options/Format. Hope somebody will once hack a plugin for disabling line wrapping on demand without this dance...= Anyway,I received complaints my patches were damaged nevertheless when sending inline. So I switched back to attachments (except for real tiny, non-wrapping patches). As long as you unsure that those patches do not suffer from special encoding, one one can still easily quote them on repl= y. Jan --------------enig09D036831D26894C6994D033 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE3CuAniDOoMHTA+kRAvsBAJ9hTETSY4D5utsEZZHCqKUVJGwtygCfb963 Cg1wkpO3NSTfDT6k/5UGop8= =EOMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig09D036831D26894C6994D033--