From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gasper Azman Subject: some testing questions Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:44:44 +0200 Message-ID: <44DCC20C.7020400@email.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE9BBCBF67B1B262765301B9C" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: To: "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" --------------enigE9BBCBF67B1B262765301B9C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, especially the namesys team. I have been reading this list for quite some time, and saw that issues of fragmentation have again arisen. So, a decision was made to put the portage tree on a separate reiser4 partition, and to benchmark it over ti= me. Because I know I'm not the smartest guy in the universe, I'm asking everyone here which data they would require (or want to see), how to obtain it (program names would suffice, but other advice will not go amiss) and how frequently the analysis is to be run. Since this would be a new partition with nothing but the portage tree, it is an ideal and clean environment for testing a specific feature of reiser4 (as has been frequently mentioned). I hope to make a small contribution to the development of IMHO the most promising filesystem since ext3. :) Keep it up, Gasper --------------enigE9BBCBF67B1B262765301B9C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE3MIOEpY+TjzLRFcRAggDAJ4xsW4y1hdZxczEX/S2SWrC68kiuACfXGKc gnCe1Nee4oJKwAAv4Eh+Znk= =AHyH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE9BBCBF67B1B262765301B9C--