From: Alan Shieh <ashieh@cs.cornell.edu>
To: Daniel Rodrick <daniel.rodrick@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linux Newbie <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Univeral Protocol Driver (using UNDI) in Linux
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:01:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DCE1FD.5020901@cs.cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <292693080608100118rc910647l7a8bf95fbc2df26c@mail.gmail.com>
> Umm ... pardon me if I am wrong, but I think you implemented a "UNDI
> Driver" (i.e. the code that provides implementation of UNDI API, and
> often resides in the NIC ROM) . I'm looking forward to write a
> "Universal Protocol Driver" (i.e. the code that will be a linux kernel
> module and will, use the UNDI API provided by your UNDI driver).
I wrote a universal protocol driver that runs in Linux, and talks to an
extended UNDI stack implemented in Etherboot.
>> At minimum, one needs to be able to probe for !PXE presence, which means
>> you need to map in 0-1MB of physical memory. The PXE stack's memory also
>> needs to be mapped in. My UNDI driver relies on a kernel module, generic
>> across all NICs, to accomplish these by mapping in the !PXE probe area
>> and PXE memory in a user process.
>
>
> I'm pretty newbie to PXE, but I I think !PXE structure is used to find
> out the location & size of PXE & UNDI runtime routines, by UNIVERSAL
> PROTOCOL DRIVERS. Is my understanding wrong?
That's right.
> Also, I think that UNDI driver routine will need not call PXE routines
> (TFTP / DHCP etc) as UNDI routines would be at a lower level providing
> access to the bare bones hardware. Is this correct?
I'm calling the UNDI level routines (packet send, interrupt handling)
from my driver.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-11 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 10:39 Univeral Protocol Driver (using UNDI) in Linux Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-07 15:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-07 16:11 ` Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-07 16:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-08 5:13 ` Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-08 5:13 ` Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-08 15:04 ` Alan Shieh
2006-08-10 8:18 ` Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-10 8:18 ` Daniel Rodrick
2006-08-11 20:01 ` Alan Shieh [this message]
2006-08-10 20:59 ` Donald Becker
2006-08-10 20:59 ` Donald Becker
2006-08-10 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-11 20:48 ` Alan Shieh
2006-08-11 20:48 ` Alan Shieh
2006-08-08 16:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-07 18:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-07 18:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-07 18:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-28 9:59 Deepak Gupta
2006-09-28 9:59 ` Deepak Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DCE1FD.5020901@cs.cornell.edu \
--to=ashieh@cs.cornell.edu \
--cc=daniel.rodrick@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.