From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: priv_data patch Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:59:21 +0200 Message-ID: <44E0ABE9.8070005@trash.net> References: <44E07BCD.8030206@trash.net> <20060814142559.GS7194@kriss.csbnet.se> <44E08946.1040105@trash.net> <20060814152026.GU7194@kriss.csbnet.se> <44E09693.9000606@trash.net> <20060814160443.GX7194@kriss.csbnet.se> <44E0A132.6040709@trash.net> <20060814165549.GC7194@kriss.csbnet.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Joakim Axelsson In-Reply-To: <20060814165549.GC7194@kriss.csbnet.se> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Joakim Axelsson wrote: > The change is NOT worth it if we can't keep the priv_data pointer between > changes of unrelated rules. I better use a global list instead as condition > is using today. Thats my feeling as well. > Still, i want to know in whcih format the new modules are wanted. Patch, > files fitting pom-ng or my own svn-repository to source.list? An URL to an external repository is preferred.